Vincent Lingga , The Jakarta Post , Jakarta Tue, 11/25/2008 7:14 AM Headlines
Almost one week after Sinar Mas Multi Artha, the financial unit of the powerful Sinar Mas business group, signed a preliminary agreement to acquire 70 percent of Bank Century, this small bank remained in a liquidity crisis, forcing the central bank to put it under the control of the state-owned Deposit Insurance Corporation last Friday.
Sinar Mas’ commitment to take control of Bank Century should have reignited market confidence in this small bank and enable it to get access to interbank loans. But it didn’t.
The big question is then: Is liquidity in the banking industry so tight that this publicly listed bank was unable to secure interbank loans to resolve its illiquidity even with the strong support of the Sinar Mas Group?
The answer is a resounding “No”.
Analysts and bankers estimate that Bank Indonesia’s lowering of the minimum reserve requirement at banks last month from 9.5 percent to 7.5 percent unleashed between Rp 50 trillion (US$4.5 billion) and Rp 70 trillion in new lending resources. Moreover, the pace of bank lending has slowed down from its annualized rate of 35 percent in the first three quarters.
But why are many banks still complaining about tight liquidity and businesses groaning over what they claim to be a tightening of credit?
“The problem is not liquidity because industry-wide the level of liquidity is adequate. But banks awash with liquidity are reluctant to lend to others out of fear their money will not be repaid,” Bank Indonesia’s research and regulatory director Halim Alamsyah said.
He revealed there had been suspicions among money market players, notably between small banks, as one bank did not trust the soundness of another bank, hindering interbank lending.“That is why we (Bank Indonesia) have recommended that the government introduce a blanket guarantee on all liabilities of banks, including interbank loans and letters of credit,” Bank
Indonesia Deputy Governor Hartadi Sarwono said.
There seems to be information asymmetry within the banking industry.
Theoretically, banks that are not under the special surveillance of Bank Indonesia (the central bank) are assumed to be sound.
But the suspicions between banks have spread widely. This condition is, to a limited extent, similar to the environment in the financial market in the United States since September, when the financial crisis turned into a total crash following the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers investment bank.
Such mutual distrust should not have hit banks in Indonesia because they do not own, or have not bought, the toxic assets (subprime mortgages and derivatives) that fueled the U.S. financial crisis.
Several bankers said the segmentation within the banking industry has widened to the point where big banks are increasingly uncertain about the quality of small banks’ assets.
Faced with huge difficulties of their own, banks have tightened their purse strings, lending less and driving up the cost of credit to consumers and corporations — thus compounding the already grim outlook for the world economy.
Uncertainty about the depth and length of the global slowdown is making things much murkier. But the combination of a battered banking system and shell-shocked consumers suggests things could get particularly tough for many businesses. So banks prefer to secure as much cash as they can now to make sure they can see their operations through the downturn.
Many bankers also are nervous that borrowers who look solid today may turn out not to be so solid within the next few weeks or months. In the current environment, bankers are nervous that other banks might shut them out, out of fear, and stop extending them short-term credit.
Doesn’t this mean a distrust in the quality of banks under the supervision of the central bank?Certainly a blanket guarantee, as recommended by the central bank and most businesspeople, will with one stroke remove the clog within inter-bank lending.
But this may simply encourage reckless lending practices and bad bank governance practices, further exposing taxpayers to the risk of having to pay for another big bailout.
However, if banks fully trust the integrity and reliability of Bank Indonesia’s bank oversight, it should be possible and easier for them to better identify which banks are reliable.
In normal times, banks have several mechanisms for providing the necessary information, such as accounting disclosures, quarterly balance sheets and credit rating agencies. But the financial situation now is irrational and volatile.
