Vincent Lingga, Tue, April 19 2016
| 08:35 am
China’s One Belt One Road (OBOR) development agenda to boost
connectivity between mainland China and 65 countries in Asia and Europe
by building infrastructure ties fits well with the 2010 Master Plan on
ASEAN Connectivity.
The Hong Kong government, which will host the
first Belt and Road Summit on May 18, chose infrastructure development
opportunities in the Southeast Asian region as the main focus of
discussions between business leaders, ministers and investors from
around the world.
ASEAN countries will be able to tap the more
than US$200 billion in financing resources that China’s policy banks,
including the $100 billion Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)
and the $50 billion Silk Road Infrastructure Fund, have committed to
infrastructure, notably road and rail links and power grids along the
corridor covered by the OBOR initiative.
President Xi Jinping
launched the OBOR initiative in early 2014 to build a network of
overland road and rail routes, oil and natural gas pipelines and other
infrastructure that will stretch from central China through Central Asia
and ultimately reach as far as Moscow and Venice.
But even
though President Xi has asserted from the outset that the OBOR
initiative would adhere to the principles of noninterference in other
nations, not seeking to increase the sphere of influence, a number of
countries are concerned over the geopolitical impact of the agenda.
Analysts,
senior government officials and business leaders who talked to
journalists from ASEAN countries during a series of presummit briefings
in Hong Kong last week have mixed views on the OBOR initiative. The
leading thread of views sees the initiative as the Chinese government’s
recognition that its own prospects are inextricably linked with those of
its trading partners along the OBOR route.
But if the
controversies over several infrastructure projects China’s policy banks
plan to finance in Indonesia, Thailand and Laos are any guide, the
strongest note of caution prevailing now is: China needs to tread very
carefully and work hard to gain trust for the Belt and Road agenda to
boost connectivity and commerce between China and the 65 other countries
involved.
A proposed $5 billion railway line that stretches
through to Thailand could support that country’s ambitions to become a
regional logistics hub, and China’s need to access key export markets,
offering a win-win for both countries. But latest reports from Thailand
suggest Thailand might go alone in financing the construction of the
first phase of the project instead of seeking financial loans from
China, as originally planned, due to what it claimed were unusually high
interest rates charged by Chinese lenders.
The 250-kilometer
railway is seen as part of an ambitious network linking Bangkok with
Kunming in Southwest China’s Yunnan province, through Laos in the north
and connecting Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore in the south.
Obviously,
upon completion, the countries involved will all benefit from such
regional arteries. But the uncertainty shows that different countries
may have different expectations when they respond to China’s overtures.
Some
prospective projects also could potentially be viewed as primarily
benefiting China by building local infrastructure unrelated to the OBOR
route, such as the $5 billion Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway.
Such
a suspicion may arise because the OBOR initiative was launched at a
time when China’s economic growth fell from a two-digit level to below 7
percent.
Hence, many see the agenda as China’s attempt to
export its huge excess manufacturing capacity in steel, cement and
various other industrial products.
Such an impression has been
strengthened by the fact that China’s policy bank loans extended for
infrastructure development have mostly been tied to the involvement of
Chinese companies, either as suppliers of machinery and raw materials or
in construction and operation.
Hong-Kong based brokerage CLSA
and China’s Citic Securities noted in a recent report that China was
preparing to counter the accelerating slowdown in its domestic economy
through enormous investments in overseas infrastructure that could
absorb overcapacity in key industries.
The aggressive lending by
China’s policy banks like the China Development Bank and Exim Bank to
such developing countries as Indonesia has also been seen as a program
to boost exports through Chinese companies that win construction jobs.
Last
August, for example, the China Development Bank gave $3 billion in
loans to Indonesian state-owned Bank Mandiri, BRI and BNI to finance
infrastructure projects that involve Chinese construction companies. So
suspicious has the House of Representatives been of these loans that the
House’s finance commission summoned the directors of the three banks
for explanations on how those loans were spent.
In addition, as
Julian Vella, the Asia Pacific head of global infrastructure at KPMG
International, cautioned in a recent analysis that Chinese investors
must acknowledge that some of the countries on the proposed OBOR route
have traditionally strong links to other nations with a vested interest
in the region, and may resist China’s overtures.
Certainly,
implementing the Belt and Road agenda will require a high level of
mutual understanding of the regulatory, political, legal, financial and
project risks, such as resource nationalism, transparency and labor
unrest associated with potential projects along the OBOR route.
All
in all though, seeing it from the positive side of things, the OBOR
initiative will help fulfill part of Asia’s huge funding gap for
infrastructure financing, which is estimated by the Asian Development
Bank (ADB) at $800 billion annually over the next decade.
In fact
Japan’s recent decision to commit more than $100 billion in new lending
resources to the ADB within the next five years specially for funding
high-quality infrastructure should also be seen as another positive
impact of China’s OBOR initiative.
Yet more encouraging is the
statement made by AIIB president Jin Liqun in Washington last Wednesday
that the AIIB, the ADB and the World Bank would cofinance infrastructure
projects in Asia.
Browse » Home
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment